The 1st Amendment Cover Image
The 1st Amendment Profile Picture
The 1st Amendment
94 people like this

My body, my choice...stop terrorizing these women! Abortion is still legal, go get a frggin permit if you want to be harassing clinics patients.

I posted this video on Facebook yesterday. My account was "restricted" but supposedly NOT for this post, because that would be an obvious block by what I'm standing out against, But a MEME post from way back in 2020 that pokes fun at the $600 that was "given us" by the "generosity" of the government....

I will probably be silenced by fbjail for speaking my opinion and posting this video, but things do need to change. I would also recommend that everyone read about, and sign the petition for the Convention of States, and learn about 3 changes they want to make to the constitution.

Coincidence? I think NOT!

In 2002 the coronavirus was seen as something that could be used to exploit. On April 25th 2003 the center for disease control and prevention filed a patent of the coronavirus transmitted to humans. According to Patent Laws, nature is forbidden from being patented. Therefore SARS (coronavirus) was either manufactured, making a patent on it legal...or it was natural, making a patent on it illegal. If it was manufactured, it was a violation of biological and chemical weapons. If it was natural, filling a patent on it was illegal. Either outcome is illegal!

In the Spring of 2007, the CDC filed a petition with the patent office to is an office to keep their patent application on coronavirus private and confidential. They also filed patents on its detection and kits to measure it. Because of that patent, they could control who was able to make any independent inquiries into coronavirus.

Basically you (other scientists and researchers) can not look at the virus, cannot measure it, and cannot develop a test kit for it unless they allowed it. These patents gave them the motive, the means, and the monetary gain from turning coronavirus from a pathogen to profit.

Between 2012 and 2013 the NIH (National Institute for Health) realized that something they were doing was wrong. They had a legal moral, and social reason to object to the research and stated that Gain of Function research on Coronavirus should be suspended.

The federal funding for research that was funding grants for places like Harvard, Emory University, UNC Chapel Hill, etc. received letters telling them they were receiving notice to STOP researching on Gain of Function of Coronavirus, but at the bottom of this notice it said "as your grant is currently funded, this pause is voluntary". In other words... Keep Going...

In 2014-15, GoF research on this virus started feeling the legal and moral pressures to stop this research done in the US, they offshored the research. The US government gave $3.7 million grant to the Wuhan Institute of Technology for coronavirus Gain of Function research. But, they intentionally covered their money trail, running money through a series of cover organizations to make it look like they were funding a US operation that was subcontracting with the WIT, so that the US wouldn't be accountable.

[Gain-of-function research is medical research that genetically alters an organism in a way that may enhance the biological functions of gene products. This may include an altered pathogenesis, transmissibility, or host range, i.e. the types of hosts that a microorganism can infect.]


#covid #illegal #bioweapon #corruptgov #treason #plandemic #biologicalwarfare


Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government.