NYT reporters now say Biden's inner circle protected him: Now they tell us. In an act akin to shutting the stable door after all the horses have bolted, four of the New York Times's leading scribes are now reporting that Joe Biden's inner circle knew about his emotional and cognitive decline, and they took steps to conceal it from the rest of us. As the Times shamelessly reports: "They rearranged meetings to make sure Mr. Biden was in a better mood. ... At times, they delayed sharing information with him, including negative polling data, as they debated the best way to frame it. They surrounded him with aides when he walked from the White House to the waiting presidential helicopter on the South Lawn so that news cameras could not capture his awkward bearing." This prolonged deception was, of course, a deep and dangerous disservice to the nation, but how plausible is it that the Times's Katie Rogers, Adam Entous, Maggie Haberman, and Carl Hulse were all a bunch of Sergeant Shultzes? That they knew nothing, NOTHING, about Biden's cognitive decline, even though we in our humble shop were sounding the alarm about it more than four years ago?
