Senator Chris Coons, Delaware Democrat, said on this week’s broadcast of “Fox News Sunday,” hosted by ‘Commie’ Chris ‘I’m a Pro’ Wallace, that Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s positions were “disqualifying” for the post for which she has been nominated.  It’s without a doubt that Coons just might be one of the dumbest Senators we have.  Apparently, they have few to pick from there in Delaware when sending folks off to Congress.  No one cares what Coons thinks, if he doesn’t think Barrett belongs on the Court, then he should vote against her confirmation.

It was our genius Mr. Coons who said, “Well, I’m going to be laying out the ways in which Judge Barrett’s views, her views on reaching back and reconsidering and overturning long-settled precedent are not just extreme, they are disqualifying.”  How far this country has fallen to think that we are now living in an age where choosing not to support fourth trimester abortion is now considered to be EXTREME.  That alone makes clear that it’s those who support such an atrocity are the ones to be considered as EXTREME, and most certainly not Judge Amy Coney Barrett.  

Anyway, Coons then went on to tell ‘Commie Chris’ Wallace, “She has taught at a well-regarded law school. She clerked for Justice Scalia, but she has views that make her not qualified to serve on the Supreme Court. President Trump has said he would only nominate someone who would overturn the Affordable Care Act, taking away health care protection for more than 100 million Americans in the middle of a pandemic. Both President Trump and members of the majority on this committee have said they would only vote for a nominee who would overturn Roe vs. Wade.”

He added, “As I will layout in my questioning this week, we shouldn’t be having this hearing with two members of the committee infected with COVID. It’s rushed, it constitutes court-packing, and her views are too extreme to qualify her to serve on this court.”  IF this process can be considered as being rushed, it’s the Democrats themselves who are to blame.  After all, who is it that has been calling for abolishing the Electoral College or making all manner of changes to the voting process that far from making the process more secure, only serves to make it far easier to cheat.

The Democrats new ‘Plan A’ for trying to derail the confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett is to do their best to bastardize the meaning of ‘packing the court.’  The generally accepted definition describes ‘court packing’ as adding more judges to the total number of 9.  It has nothing whatsoever with the race of the nominee, the gender of the nominee, or simply the act of filling a vacant seat.  But they also seem to have a ‘Plan B,’ to not supply a quorum for votes in the Senate as another way to try and block the confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett before the election.

And it was our Democrat candidate for vice president, ‘The Ho,’ who tried the same crap during the debate, when she proclaimed that the administration filling vacant federal judge positions was supposedly court packing.  These people will say anything, and they assume we’re stupid enough to actually fall for it. The sad thing is that a large number of those who support the left either will be gullible enough or stupid enough to fall for it, or will know it's idiotic, but support it anyhow since the false definition supports the outcome they want. They have no shame, none what-so-ever.

We all should be disturbed by the possibly of true ‘court packing.’ The Supreme Court is supposed to be nonpartisan, politically blind so to speak. The fact the liberals actively search for a person who will side with them should be a disqualifying quality for anyone they nominate. The fact they see someone steeped in the Constitution as an opponent, and one who is nominated to “stack” the court, highlights their total disregard for our Constitution. The left wants America dead, they see the court is the quickest and most effective means possible for them to accomplished that goal.

Because we have now something occurring with all the frequency of a solar eclipse, that being the Republicans sticking together, the Democrats know they don't have the votes.  Hence their rationale for doing all that they can to degrade and trash, in the minds of the public, a woman who, by all accounts, is the perfect nominee.  But it won’t work.  The Democrats are the party of Socialism, of death and of hate.  With luck they’ll be thrown out on November 3 in numbers no amount of cheating will be able to overcome in what will be a humiliating defeat and in historic numbers.

Democrats love to accuse the opposition of being the ones with extreme positions.  Which party is it that has, over the course of the last four years, exhibited behavior that any ‘normal’ person would definitely view as being extreme?  From flat out refusing to accept the outcome of the 2016 election, to coming up with ways to alter its outcome, to then having over 70 of it members refuse to attend the inauguration, to concoct one bizarre rationale after another to justify impeaching  a president who had committed no crime and on and on. Talk about disqualifying behavior!