More should be done to prevent bulling in schools and on college campuses. Due to there is no strict and effective system of protection of harassed victims, the amount of crucial consequences of bullying only increases every year, and supervisors at schools and colleges do not often pay attention to pupil’s problems. We will discuss it in this article shared by https://essays-writer.net/short-answer-questions-writer.html.

Nowadays, bullying is a usual phenomenon. It means acts of harassment in schools and colleges, or even universities, in relation to students. Therefore, the first reason to do more to prevent harassment is that there are a lot of accidents that have happened in the history, which have resulted into suicide actions taken by students’ peers. Moreover, this amount increases every year. According to Thomas Billitteri, an eighteen-year old freshman of the Rutgers University named Tyler Clementi “committed suicide by jumping off the George Washington Bridge after two classmates allegedly used a hidden webcam to transmit images of him having a gay encounter in his dormitory room”. There was also an accident with a girl, “15-years old Phoebe Prince, who hanged herself in January after alleged bullying at high school in South Hadley, Mass”. The reasons for the suicides of the victims of bullying are the same. It was not just bullying that had led them to making such crucial life decisions. Harassment only intensifies deep depression, the lack of self-confidence, and the instability of the nervous system. The consequences of cruel actions of persons of the same age leave an indestructible mark on the pupils’ state of mind, lying heavily upon it. As a result, if children do not commit suicides, they simply become tuned out, drop out, and do not feel themselves safe at school anymore. Later, when victims recover from such mental injuries being grown-ups, they revise their lives thinking over the reasons and their unwise behavior in the former situations. Many of them live happily, but recall their school years with horror or repulsion. Some calmly look back at the past and help new generations to avoid such problems. Others, who are weak, will lay hands on themselves. Sometimes, accidents of murdering happen at schools and colleges. There is also the amount of the former victims of bullying that become ardent protectors of the bullied people’s rights. Their negative experience connected with bullying only provoked them to help others. There is also such a kind of harassment of the upcoming era as cyberbullying meaning bullying through the mass media in the Internet. Such cases concern a particular questionnaire aimed to know people’s opinion about themselves. Afterwards, hurtful answers can derange student’s emotional stability. This kind of bullying may include the circulation of nude photos of a victim or just simple gossips that in a certain period of life lead the person to destruction. This time, harassment is like a trigger that results into exacerbation, unsteadiness, and despair in the minds of young people struggling with complex living conditions.

Another reason to do more to prevent bullying is the lack of the attention of supervisors at schools, colleges, and campuses. They often do not focus on students’ problems, which often concern them and are minor, insignificant, or somewhat childish. In addition, such inattention leads to the alienation of pupils. They drop out or tune out. More should be done to prevent bullying than just simple tittle-tattle. Chatting does not lead to necessary consequences, “…the school is teaching (anti-bullying) because they have to, not because they want to. They need more outside sources or someone closer to our age, something more interactive than a PowerPoint Presentation”.

The third reason is that there is no strict and effective system of protection of harassed victims in the country. A variety of laws have been adopted in different states, but they do not guarantee necessary protection. These are not effective and are even not maintained correctly and constantly by educational establishments. “According to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education’s study of nearly 400 universities across the country, 71 percent of schools maintain codes that clearly and substantially violate the First Amendment”.

The counterargument is the dissenting point of view in such cases, when students’ free speech is persecuted. In trying to protect the harassed students’ rights, the government issues a series of laws that do not really protect bullied pupils and oppress their free will. Accidents, which are really frightful and destructive to the mental and physical life of students and labelled “bullying”, are “already an offense under laws and regulations dealing with stalking, vandalism, telephonic harassment, and threats. Virtually every college in the country is required by federal law to have strong rules banning discriminatory harassment”. Therefore, governmental establishments should revise such offences as those that border with criminal actions or are even such actions per se. Students expressing their points of view are often involved in suspicious investigations and severe punishments. They cannot even parody or satire anything innocuously or express somewhat controversial thoughts in order not to be mixed in investigations. Additional legislation is not needed in the country, but it should be amended to be focused more on protecting bullied victims’ rights than oppressing students’ free will.

Therefore, there are three points of view on the problem of harassment in schools and on college campuses. The one reason that more should be done to prevent bullying is the inattention of supervisors and that simple PowerPoint Presentation or instructional discussions are not enough. The second reason is that the amount of incidents with destructive consequences increases every year. That is a pity. Another point of view on the issue of bullying states that a great variety of laws adopted in many states oppress students’ freedom of speech, but are not so effective, when the case concerns the actual protection of bullied victims. Moreover, this reason borders with the counterargument that states the aftereffects of laws that do not protect students from harassment, but impudently harass them.