Yes, I totally this. At every OSRS GP chance, I tried to slide into more"untradeable/completionist articles", but the replies just could not reflect it entirely. I would have liked a general remarks box at the end since there were several things I wished to react to in more detail however had no place to do so. While completionist content would not make it. I'm pretty bummed out that the completionist community couldn't express their opinions for game leadership. I was also very glad to find the HD OSRS screenshots. They were ranked by me as an optional toggle, as as my top. It'd make me even more enthusiastic to log in and get immersed.

I totally know but my experience let's me think it is fine if you do not feel comfortable with Qualtrics. So let's say I replied this poll honestly, who would you envision gets that data? After GDPR I have felt pressured by every single site ever to monitor and track me it is disgusting, and even disgusting that it was all happening before without my knowledge. Taking a look at the survey link along with the basic disclosures in the bottom of the webpage it does not appear the Jagex is using a third-party firm so in that case the only men and women who would have immediate access to your information would be the survey developers who can pull exports from the database to distribute internally. EU also has some fairly powerful data privacy legislation which (at least my US based company which frequently interacts with Qualtrics links) are followed fairly strictly by the survey programmers and information hosting websites.

After running through the poll Jagex definitely appears to be operating solo on this one. No third party firm would let participants directly enter inside their own contact info (because it would mean they'd lose your business for their client [so not a nefarious thing]) and also the only part I found kinda strange was the phone number request in the conclusion. I'd have substituted that using a check box for recontacting and then pipe-in the email that you could optionally have put in sooner for affirmation. I think you are fine answering this survey when you have privacy issues since essentially all information is anonymous and it is using an industry-standard platform of Qualtrics. Jagex likely doesn't have market study ISO certifications but this is a quick yearly survey so they wouldn't need to have any.

I hope this feedback encourages the team to make surveys more targeted to the viewers who knowingly take part in the content they're polling, or use them as an advisory tool rather than a judgment. It'd be interesting if they reveal some of the outcomes of the survey. I answered the exact contrary, that polling is in the crux of OSRS and they need to stick with it strictly. For clarity, I answered that polling is in the core of OSRS. The poll system empowers the whole playerbase to start freeform discussion on the planned changes/additions created to Runescape itself and it's absolutely a terrific way to gather feedback and public comment on something. With that said, I don't think the current format meets the best interests of Runescape.

I really don't believe that buy 2007 runescape gold the player base is very good at determining which content, based on merit, is good for integrity and the health of Runescape long term. We view people vote based on self interest. Based on polling, the neighborhood generally enjoyed 6hr NMZ but it was significant to remove. Players do not vote for any changes which make things tougher for them personally but over time which becomes a drawback as content becomes simpler and achievements are diluted, these are very minor but readily add up.