(The questions I use for the Atheist Advocate come from atheist websites. I just came across one titled - "Ten Questions Biblical Literalists Cannot Honestly Answer" - Are we up to the challenge?)
Atheist Advocate (AA): - Question 7 - "Is observable physical evidence more important and valid than what the bible claims to be true? The general stance is to start by believing the bible and then to look at science, and everything which seems to agree with the bible within a scientific framework is right, and that anything which disagrees with the bible is just wrong no matter what."
[How do we answer this Atheist Advocate?]
