I believe Facebook and others are exposed to a lawsuit on the basis of equal protection and due process.

In a nutshell, the corrupt corporate law firms (one of which employed my Dad for his life) will not be there for the individual, unless there is a payoff down the line. And they cost millions. That leaves injured individuals to seek redress in a forum which Patriots typically don't use. Patriots need to organize, and fund these types of efforts, like the radical left does continually (SPLC, ACLU). The NRA doesn't fight the battles.

Due process, because certain rights (make money, access the public square) are inalienable. The only question is... can you apply this the federal communications act. I believe you can, since the amendment is concerned with injustice, not policing a certain legal area. In other words, the right is the individual's. I also think you could sue Facebook under simply procedural due process because THEY don't enforce t and c's evenly.

Equal protection applies because the government is allowing a public utility (yes) to operate in a discriminatory manner by unequal application of their protective benefit. In other words, both need each other to discriminate.

As to the current argument that Facebook is not the public square, you could show how they actually are public on the internet, or use a simple end around to argue that it doesn't matter, because a congressional law can never override the constitution.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik....i/Substantive_due_pr

Substantive due process - Wikipedia