Two early ones today. The biggest thing for me is that I am taking a new view of what's appropriate for handling this massive Dem voter fraud that's getting dangerously close to being gotten away with. But I'll go to point #2 first, just because it's short, quick, and easy to get out of the way. To wit, if there is a Prez Joe and a Dem legislature that wants to forgive college loans and make college free, they DAMN sure better not practice age discrimination and not allow somebody like me to go back and get the free degrees that I deserve (and could actually understand well enough to make use of, something clearly beyond even the youthful leadership class as represented by the ignorant like of AOC and her ilk).
The other point is more fundamental, and more controversial. As this electoral campaign wound on, I considered the Dem fear-mongering about Trump resisting a transition was pure silliness. That was before I saw the unbelievable collection of ways the Dems were stealing the election. My earlier view may have been naive, but it was naive only in that I never dreamed they would be doing the degree of cheating they have and are doing. And how deep and exhaustive is their network of "insurance policies" (thank you, Strozk and Page, for being careless enough to put the term in our lexicon with that context), from workers at poll level to voting machines to media to political and judicial insertions making stopping any of it virtually impossible.
I think my naive earlier view overlooked one big thing when I figured that whole "watch out, Trump's going to resist" thing was ludicrous. I missed that they actually knew they were cheating so badly, could get caught, and that could made such resistance by the Trump side completely justified and not even surprising. The key, of course, is there would be no resisting a LEGITIMATE election loss, but resisting an ILLEGITIMATE one might be the only appropriate action to maintain any semblance of governmental integrity in our country.
I have been highly critical of the rioting tactics of BLM/Antifa. They have destroyed much of our country, all for a premise based on the proven lie of "Hands up, don't shoot" and everything that's sprung from its continued dissemination despite it's having been utterly disproved. But even if those riots were based on a false premise, the rioters certainly BELIEVED, MORE than wholeheartedly, in the faulty premises that spawned their destructive "protestations." If those actions were deemed justifiable for a bogus underlying reason, how much more justifiable would similar tactics be for something legitimate like stopping stealing an election, preventing an illegitimate taking of control of our government?
I don't like where this is going, but it's clear what the "where" is where it's going. I just hope we're prepared for it. The right side of the aisle, of the country, has very little experience with "handling" matters this way. But the old, tried and true, civil ways of defending truth and liberty being thwarted by these myriad "insurance policies" may ultimately be forcing their hand. Better get good at it, and braver than they've been in anybody's living memory, fast, if fairness is to have a chance of preservation.
