You are the wreck of order, breach of laws
You are to nothing constant but to ill
Your loves are set on nothing but your will
You are the least of goods, the worst of evils
I would stop the 1-6 hearing, inquire of the lib/dem presenters of their hearsay evidence: “Why aren’t you presenting testimony from the person(s) with direct knowledge?” In a court of law, you would never be allowed to call someone who is testifying on what someone else said, from yet another party, which is hearsay. Moreover, you have an obligation as an attorney to do at least a little bit of effort to attempt to corroborate the allegations that you are making.
I’m not finding this witness to be credible(1) or the credibility of that evidence, it suggests a motive on the part of the presenters of the evidence to further their narrative, which is not an accurate one, and they’re putting their thumb on the scale of justice to try to achieve a result that they want. It is not a result that has anything to do with the truth(2). They’re creating the liberal’s childish psychological safe space for democrats going into an election they’re gonna get annihilated on, where they get to be the heroes claiming, fallaciously, that they are doing a lot standing up for our democracy.
AGAIN, the problem with hutchinson’s testimony and that it is 3rd of 4th party hearsay. WHY AREN’T WE HEARING DIRECTLY FROM THE Secret Service agents WHO WERE ACTUALLY THERE!!! There’s not some Secret Service exemption to being subpoenaed. That doesn’t exist. These people, these libs, these democrat frauds in Congress are ridiculous.
This is just again their false narrative creation for libs who can’t look at the reality of gas prices, crime, the border, inflation, et cetera. It feels like the Hail-Mary pass in football. If Trump’s so bad, why do libs/dems have to always lie about him? Who in America doesn’t think that pre-pandemic America under Trump wasn’t way better?
1.hutchinson's wholly disemboweled assertion that Trump attempted to commandeer his armored SUV after completing his unfortunate remarks that fateful morning and force Secret Service agents to take him to the Capitol building. According to Hutchinson: The armored presidential fleet vehicles make clear that hutchinson’s testimony is a LIE. There are barriers between the back and front compartments of the AV/SUV that would make that contortionist act very difficult for an agile young person — much less Trump. Indeed, within hours, NBC chief White House correspondent Peter Alexander declared: “A source close to the Secret Service tells me both Bobby Engel, the lead agent, and the presidential limousine/SUV driver are prepared to testify under oath that neither man was assaulted and that Mr. Trump never lunged for the steering wheel.”
2.Among the many problems with pelosi’s effort to collect enough evidence to charge Trump with some version of “insurrection” is the fact that Trump had authorized deployment of the National Guard ahead of the events that day. According to then-Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller: “DJT authorized the use of the military to support local and federal law enforcement on 6 Jan. He directed that I provide whatever support was requested. So, technically, he authorized unlimited military support.” Miller’s top aide, then-Pentagon Chief of Staff Kash Patel, affirmed: “There’s zero chance the DoD doesn’t have a record of that. DoD spoke to Capitol Police (who report to pelosi) before Jan. 6 multiple times, and they repeatedly rejected any National Guard assistance, as did D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser.” In other words, if you planned to rob the Bank of America branch on Manhattan’s Union Square, would you call 911 before this heist and urge the NYPD to scramble 100 squad cars to the scene of the crime?