"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it. Even countries that were once more prosperous than their neighbors have found themselves much poorer than their neighbors after just one generation of socialistic policies.”— Thomas Sowell
"What many young people today don’t realize is that socialism is a machine for empowering insiders. Few insiders have ever been rewarded more assiduously than the nomenklatura of the Soviet Union or China, or North Korea, or Cuba, or Cambodia, etc. Few governments have been as dark—in every sense of the word—as the Brezhnev regime. A vast expansion of the American government, as imagined by today’s Democratic Socialists, would create its own privileged elite that would soon turn dictatorial. From its inception, by contrast, Capitalism was designed for outsiders. Its original apostles, such as Adam Smith, argued that entrepreneurs needed freedom from the royal regulations that limited trade and the formation of new enterprises. When the government controls decisions to work or to start a business, political pull becomes a prerequisite for success. The whole point of economic freedom is that all people—not just the connected—can use their talents to help themselves and, potentially, to change the world.”--Edward Glaeser
Naive, ignorant or miscreant believers tend to see democratic socialism as a kind of utopianism, i.e. a future without capitalism but somehow with enough of everything to meet every need. For their part, democratic socialists view democrats as compromised, impure, and not committed to solving the real problem (capitalism). A resurgence of democratic socialism will require that proponents like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez be able to answer some of the practical questions that they have historically failed to address.
What does the democrat socialists’ goal of socialism actually mean? If abolishing capitalism is its goal how are the growth, efficiency and innovation that are the prerequisites for redistribution to be achieved? And if reforms can’t create a better world, then how is socialism to be achieved? Is democracy, even when flawed, a means or an end? Will democratic socialists prioritize democracy if the votes for a “socialist future” do not materialize? Will they eschew the compromises and alliances necessary to protect democracy? The unwillingness and the refusal by some American leftists to support mrs.b.j. clinton, come to mind, as does the willingness of some democratic socialists to consider running outside the democratic Party. And will democratic socialists accept the trade-offs and bridge-building necessary to win elections? Or is compromise, as Salazar put it, antithetical to truly fighting “for the working class and marginalized”?
Thus far democratic socialists have effectively mobilized discontent with their critique of the status quo. But critiques unaccompanied by viable solutions do little more than whip up the already angry and frustrated, with more destabilization the likely upshot. Or, if your goal is democratic socialism and you achieve it, why would you ever agree to allow the regressive forces of capitalism to return? In Cuba and Venezuela(1) and elsewhere the answer has been to prevent ending of the socialist revolution at all costs, including starvation, ending privation, economic collapse, pro-government gang violence, imprisoning political rivals, state control of the media, propaganda about secret plots to undermine the state, etc, etc. democratic socialists may be against violence in theory but in practice, they warm up to it once in power.
democratic socialists never denounce their fellow socialists abroad who are already doing these things. Shouldn’t democratic socialists (or neo-liberals) be ready and willing to distance herself from socialist autocrats like nicolas maduro and daniel ortega? But again, that’s a minimum. It would also be great if they could explain how her socialist utopianism is going to work. If we’re evolving beyond capitalism, what comes next? How do we get there without killing the golden goose that inevitably destroys social democracies? Dem-socs can't answer these questions which is why they are always dodging opportunities to debate and also why the left-wing-biased media won’t ask these questions. Waiting for answers will take even longer than trying to convince millennial socialists that this is a dangerous fantasy. In the mean time we might all have to suffer the results of their ideology, that they alone deserve.
CONTINUED...
Supplemental Info:
https://nypost.com/2025/11/09/....opinion/mamdanis-peo