Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) was lambasted by Fox News host Maria Bartiromo for failing to fulfill his promise to subpoena Hunter Biden and key Deep State officials involved in the Obamagate scandal. During “Sunday Morning Futures”, Bartiromo called out Graham for waiting until the last minute to release key transcripts showing the Russia hoax was an invention of Hillary Clinton and Deep State operatives trying to remove President Trump from office. “People are mad at you as well. Why didn’t you declassify the Russiagate transcripts before the election?” Bartiromo asked. “Was there anything could have done differently to make people feel that there was accountability for an effort to take down a candidate and then a sitting president with the whole Russia hoax nonsense?”

Liberals may be able to argue with Fox News or even Republican politicians. But what happens when a peer reviewed study comes out of one of their coveted and prestigious universities in California potentially showing that their collective reaction to Covid may have been completely worthless and, as a result, may have done exceptionally more harm than good? Along those lines, it seems like a good idea to point out that a new peer reviewed study out of Stanford is questioning the effectiveness of lockdowns and stay-at-home orders (which it calls NPIs, or non-pharmaceutical interventions) to combat Covid-19. The study’s lead author is an associate professor in the Department of Medicine at Stanford.

https://youtu.be/B2CDPu8b1eo