From Twitter:
David Asman
@DavidAsmanfox
Remarkable that a story based entirely on anonymous stories gets all the press while sourced refutations from witnesses are ignored. When I was a WSJ editor I insisted that no story contain more that 25% anonymous sourcing....my how things have changed...and not for the better.
David Asman
@DavidAsmanfox
Remarkable that a story based entirely on anonymous stories gets all the press while sourced refutations from witnesses are ignored. When I was a WSJ editor I insisted that no story contain more that 25% anonymous sourcing....my how things have changed...and not for the better.