Why hasn't social media platforms been recategorized as providers?
A couple of paragraphs from todays Epoch Times article " How To Restore Civil Society After Elections".
"These Social Media companies have become active partisans enabling this violent social unrest. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Commissioner has discretionary power to re-categorize these entities as providers of content, vice simply transporters of content. Why has this not been done already? Unknown.
Twitter, Facebook, and others should be deemed partisan enablers of civil disorder by the FCC Commissioner, and/or the President, and thus are no longer subject to protection under Section 230 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, which means they may now be subject to immediate litigation by those who feel their content and traffic has been hidden, blocked, or manipulated."