A couple thoughts on what has just transpired regarding the unveiling of Charles' portrait. I've been seeing a fair bit about this recently, and CTV ran an article on it themselves.
Art is highly emotional and used in various ways to influence the public, and yes, even to send messages to those who look closely enough. Sometimes an artist just liked a thing and didn't intend any hidden message at all and is either dumbfounded or aghast at what the public saw in their work. If this artist is aghast at what the public sees, was the artist told to paint in this manner, or was it personal preference to paint in this manner as he says in the CTV article?
Click through to read my thoughts on this: https://songdove.fa-ct.com/wor....dpress-mu/songdovemu